Produce a tested core message and an audience profile for a real talk.
Most people prepare a talk by opening a slide deck and hoping the point will appear somewhere along the way. This exercise is meant to stop that habit. Before you build anything, you write the point in one sentence, describe the people who will hear it, and check with two other people that the sentence says what you think it says. It takes about twenty minutes, plus the time needed to find two colleagues.
Pick a talk you will actually give within the next two months. It can be a team update, a project review, a proposal to a manager, a client briefing or a session at an industry event. The talk has to be real for two reasons. Every later module in this course builds on what you produce here, and you will be more honest about a room you are actually going to face. If nothing is scheduled, choose a regular update or a proposal you have been meaning to make.
Arjun is a data analyst at a private healthcare group. He has six weeks to present his team's findings on missed appointments to the clinic managers' monthly meeting. He has a folder of charts, a vague idea of what he wants to say, and a habit of starting with slides. He chooses the clinic managers' meeting as his real talk.
Next, write your core message: one sentence, under 20 words, that makes a claim someone could disagree with. It has to pass the three tests from Lesson 1.1, "Say one thing your audience will remember". It has a verb, it makes a claim instead of naming a topic, and you can say it in one breath. Count the words.
A topic is a label that names a subject without claiming anything about it, and a topic label is not a message. A sentence with a verb can still fail if nobody would disagree with it. A core message has to be arguable.
Arjun's first version was "Missed appointments analysis, January to June". It fails because it is a topic. His second was "Missed appointments are a problem we should address." It has a verb, but nobody in the room would disagree with it. His third was "Sending a reminder two days before, not one, would cut missed appointments at our busiest clinics." Someone could argue with that, and it is 16 words long.
An audience profile answers the four questions from Lesson 1.2, "Who is listening and what do they need". Answer each one in full sentences:
Who is in the room What they already know What worries them What I want them to do
A two-column table works well for this, with the question on the left and your answer on the right.
Arjun's profile reads like this. In the room are seven clinic managers, the operations director, who chairs the meeting, and one person from the patient service team. They see missed appointments every day, but they don't see the pattern across clinics or by day of the week. They are worried about more work for front-desk staff and about patients complaining that they get too many messages. He wants them to agree to trial the earlier reminder at two clinics for three months.
When your profile is done, read your core message again beside it and check whether the message deals with what worries the audience. Write down any worry it leaves out. A gap doesn't always mean you have to change the message, because a later point in the talk can deal with it. Arjun noticed that his message said nothing about front-desk workload, which was the managers' main worry. He kept the message and noted that his second point had to answer that worry.
Most people skip this step, and it is the most useful step in the module. You know what you meant. The test tells you what you actually said.
Choose two testers. One should be like your audience, such as a colleague who knows the subject. The other should be unlike your audience, such as a friend or family member who doesn't. Read the message aloud once, with no explanation, no added context and no slides. Then ask: "In your own words, what am I going to argue?" Write down their answers, word for word if you can.
If a tester's version is different from what you meant, look at your own wording first. Find the gap and work out which word led them off. Rewrite the sentence and test it again. Keep going until both testers say back something you would sign. This usually takes two or three rounds. If it takes more than four rounds, you probably have two messages in one sentence, so split them and pick one.
Arjun tested his third version. His colleague in the analytics team said, "You want to change the reminder timing," which was close enough. His sister, a teacher, said, "Clinics should send more reminders," which was wrong. When he looked for the cause, he found she had heard "reminder" as "another reminder". He meant changing the timing of the existing message, without adding one. That misunderstanding would have run straight into the managers' worry about patients getting too many messages.
His fourth version was "Moving our one reminder from one day before to two days before would cut missed appointments." He tested it on his sister again, and she said, "Send the same reminder a day earlier." That matched what he meant.
Put everything on one page. The final core message goes at the top and the four-question profile goes under it. At the bottom, write each tester's version next to the wording they heard, round by round.
Arjun's finished page has four versions of the message, the two testers' replies to the last two versions, and a note on the managers' worry. In module 2, it becomes the top of his outline.
Now write your own page. Pick your two testers before you start writing, so the test happens today and not in some vague later week.
Write the message and the profile, then test the message on two people. Write down what each of them said beside your final wording.
Junxiong-WFG Organisation is an authorised representative of AIA Financial Advisers Private Limited (Reg. No. 201715016G).