Procrastination is about feelings, not laziness

You will be able to explain why people delay tasks they care about and spot the feeling behind your own delays.

The self-assessment form for Priya's year-end appraisal has been in her task system since lesson 2.4. It is written as a proper next action: "draft answers to the five questions on the appraisal form". It is on her calendar for Thursday at 2pm. On Thursday at 2pm she opens it, reads the first question, "Describe your key achievements this year", and suddenly the agency feedback seems very urgent. Then she tidies her desktop. The form moves to Friday.

She is not lazy. She works long hours and finishes plenty of hard things. So what is going on with this one task? This lesson gives you a way to understand it, because the fix depends on getting the cause right.

Procrastination as mood repair

Most people think of procrastination as a time management problem or a lack of discipline. Researchers who study it see something different. Fuschia Sirois and Timothy Pychyl, two psychologists who have written extensively on the subject, describe procrastination as a form of short-term mood repair. The task brings up a bad feeling, such as boredom, anxiety, confusion or self-doubt. Avoiding the task makes that feeling go away, immediately. The relief is real, which is why you reach for it again.

The cost comes later. The task is still there, now with less time to do it, and often with guilt added on top. Your future self pays for your present self's relief. Sirois and Pychyl put it as giving priority to how you feel now over what you want later.

Seen this way, a lot of puzzling behaviour makes sense. You avoid a 20-minute form but spend two hours on harder work that feels better. You clean the flat before studying for an exam. You answer twenty easy emails and leave the one from the unhappy client. In each case, you are choosing a task that does not trigger the bad feeling.

Which tasks we put off

The tasks people delay tend to share some traits. They are boring, so there's nothing pleasant to pull you in. They are unclear, so you don't know where to start. They are difficult, so starting means facing the chance you can't do them well. Or they are tied to a fear of judgement: someone will read this, assess it, reject it.

Priya's appraisal form ticks two of those boxes. It is unclear, because she doesn't know how much detail her manager wants, and it is tied to judgement, because writing "key achievements" makes her wonder whether hers are enough. Marcus has been putting off calling a supplier about a damaged-goods claim that is now six weeks overdue. For him it's a different pair: the call will be unpleasant, and he isn't sure what he is entitled to ask for.

Naming the trait matters, because each one has a different fix. Unclear tasks need clarifying. Difficult ones need breaking down. Boring ones need a time limit or some company. Fear of judgement often eases once you produce a rough first version that nobody sees yet.

Steel's four factors

Piers Steel, a psychologist at the University of Calgary, pulled together a large body of research on procrastination in a 2007 meta-analysis. He linked it to four factors, the same four that make up what he calls temporal motivation theory.

The first is expectancy: how confident you are that you can succeed. Low confidence, more delay. Then comes value: how rewarding or meaningful the task feels to you. Low value, more delay. The third is impulsiveness: how easily you are pulled towards whatever is in front of you. More impulsive, more delay. The last is delay itself: how far away the reward or the deadline is. A deadline in three months pulls on you far less than one tomorrow.

These factors also point to what you can change. You can raise expectancy by making the first step small enough that you know you can do it. You can raise value by connecting the task to one of your three priorities from lesson 1.3. You can reduce impulsiveness by removing distractions, as you did in module 5. And you can bring the deadline closer by setting your own, earlier one, ideally with someone who will check.

Be kind to yourself afterwards

Here is the part most people get wrong. After delaying, the instinct is to criticise yourself: "I'm hopeless, why can't I just do it?" It feels like taking responsibility, but the studies on this point the other way.

In a 2010 study of university students, Michael Wohl, Timothy Pychyl and Shannon Bennett found that students who forgave themselves for procrastinating on studying for a first exam procrastinated less before the next one. Sirois has also found links between self-compassion and lower procrastination. The reasoning fits the mood repair view. Harsh self-criticism adds to the bad feeling attached to the task, which makes avoiding it even more tempting. Treating the delay as a normal human slip, and moving on to a plan, takes some of the bad feeling away.

Being kind to yourself is not the same as letting yourself off. It means saying "that happened, it's common, and here is what I'll do next" instead of "that happened, and it proves something bad about me".

If procrastination is affecting large parts of your life, or comes with persistent low mood or anxiety, it's worth talking to a doctor. That's a different problem from a stalled form, and it deserves proper help.

For now, choose one task you've been avoiding for over a week. Your activity is to notice what you feel when you think about starting it, and write that feeling down as precisely as you can.

Pick one task you have delayed for over a week and write the feeling you get when you think about starting it.

Course

Junxiong-WFG Organisation is an authorised representative of AIA Financial Advisers Private Limited (Reg. No. 201715016G).