Practise short contributions out loud until each one takes under 45 seconds.
Record each meeting contribution on your phone, then cut it until the point comes first and the whole thing runs under 45 seconds. Recording is the fastest way to make the point, reason, example shape from Lesson 5.2, "Make your point in under a minute", feel natural in your own voice.
You hear yourself from the inside. From there you sound clear and quick. The room hears something different: the "um" before the point, the background you added in case people didn't know it, and the qualifier you tacked on at the end. About two minutes with a phone recording closes that gap.
The whole exercise takes about twenty minutes. You need a phone and a place where you can talk out loud without feeling watched. Later you'll also need one colleague or friend for five minutes.
Pick three topics your team is discussing now or will discuss in the next fortnight. They have to be real because you'll use at least one of these contributions in a meeting this week. Good places to look are the next agenda, an open question in the team chat, or a decision you know is coming.
Choose a mix. Pick one topic where you have a clear opinion, one where you have useful information but no strong view, and one where you want to raise a concern. The concern will be the hardest to keep short. Lesson 5.3, "Disagree without making it personal", showed that disagreeing is the hardest kind of contribution to keep brief, so expect that one to need the most cutting.
For each topic, write your point as one sentence. Under it, note one reason and one example. Keep these as notes and don't write out a word-for-word script. Reading aloud sounds flat, and you won't be reading in the meeting.
Open your phone's voice recorder or camera. Look at your notes for a few seconds, put them down, and speak as if you were already in the meeting. If you stumble, keep going and don't restart. You want the version you would actually say.
Play it back and time it, then write the time next to each topic. Most people's first attempt runs 60 to 90 seconds.
The first recording usually feels uncomfortable, because almost everyone dislikes hearing their own voice. The discomfort fades after a few tries. What stays with you is a clearer sense of how long you really talk for.
Listen to each recording again and mark three things:
where the point first appears background the room already knows anything after the point that weakens it
Then rework it. Move the point to your first sentence and cut the background the room already has. Keep one reason and one example, choosing the strongest of each. End by restating the point in a few words. Record again and time it. Repeat until you're under 45 seconds, which usually takes two or three tries.
Nur is a project coordinator at a property management company (an invented example, and the figures in her case are made up). She picks a team discussion about moving resident feedback from paper forms to an online form. Her first recording runs 52 seconds. She opens with "So, um", mentions that paper has always been used, and notes that some older residents prefer paper. She says last month's forms were often incomplete and that Rahim, a colleague, takes almost two days to type them in. She suggests an online form with a QR code at the lift lobby, hedges with "I'm not sure if it'd work for everyone" and "maybe as a trial", and closes with "Just something to think about." Her point arrives at second 35. A contribution can be under a minute and still be too long to hold the room if the point comes that late.
Her third recording runs 28 seconds. She opens with the point: trial an online form for resident feedback alongside paper. The reason comes next. Rahim spends almost two days a month typing in paper forms, and many come back half-filled. Then the example: a QR code at the lift lobbies, which takes a week to set up, while residents who prefer paper can still use it. She finishes by restating the point as a three-month trial, with online and paper side by side.
Her concern for older residents is still there. In the first version it worked as a hedge. In the third it is answered inside the proposal, because paper stays available. You can do the same with any hedge: answer the concern inside it and it becomes part of what you propose. Phrases like "I'm not sure" and "just something to think about" weaken a point, so cut them.
Play your three final recordings to a colleague or friend without explaining them first. After each one, ask only "What was my point?"
If they repeat your point in roughly your words, the contribution works. If they say something vaguer, such as "something about feedback forms", your point is coming too late or is too soft. When Nur played hers, her friend said "You want to try QR codes for three months." That was close enough.
Then ask which part they remember best. Often it's the example. That means the example is doing its job, and your point needs to be as concrete as the example is.
A finished set is three short voice recordings, each under 45 seconds, with your notes for each: the point, the reason, the example and the time. Keep them on your phone. Before the meeting where one of these topics comes up, play that recording once on the way in. Hearing your own clean version just before you speak makes it far more likely that's the version that comes out.
Record, time and cut three contributions, then use at least one of them in a real meeting this week.
Junxiong-WFG Organisation is an authorised representative of AIA Financial Advisers Private Limited (Reg. No. 201715016G).