Explain the difference between cognitive and emotional empathy, and say when each one helps and when it gets in the way.
Next time someone at work tells you to "show more empathy", stop and work out which kind they mean. The word covers more than one thing, and the kind most people mean at work is the one you can use without wearing yourself out.
Psychologists commonly distinguish two kinds of empathy. Cognitive empathy is understanding what another person thinks and feels: building an accurate picture of their view from the inside. Emotional empathy is feeling what another person feels alongside them, so that their stress or frustration becomes your own. The two often occur together, but they can separate. A good negotiator may understand the other side's fears in detail without feeling them. A friend may cry at your bad news without fully understanding why it hit you so hard.
The third stance is compassion: caring about someone's wellbeing and wanting things to go well for them, without absorbing their distress as your own.
When people at work say "show more empathy", they usually mean cognitive empathy, an accurate understanding of the other person. Very few people who give that advice mean you should take on everyone's distress.
Siew Ling is a product manager at a fintech company in one-north. At Tuesday's sprint review, in front of her director, Ravi, the engineering lead, says the launch date she promised a client "was never realistic" and that the product team "keeps changing the scope". She leaves the room furious.
That evening a friend kindly tells her to try to empathise with Ravi. Siew Ling finds this unhelpful. She does not want to feel what Ravi feels, and she is barely managing her own feelings. Her friend was using one word for two different things. Once Siew Ling separates them, the advice makes sense: she can work at understanding Ravi without taking on his anger.
So she sits down and thinks about the situation from Ravi's side. His team worked two weekends that month. The scope has changed twice since the date was set, both times after client requests she agreed to. And Ravi first heard about the promised date from the client, because she forgot to tell him.
None of this excuses him saying it in front of the director, but all of it makes his reaction easier to understand. It also changes her next step. Instead of preparing to defend herself, she prepares to talk about how dates get set and how scope changes get agreed.
Emotional empathy has real value. It is part of what makes people kind, and it helps you notice when someone is struggling. It also has costs, and the psychologist Paul Bloom makes a strong case about them in his book Against Empathy (2016).
His first point is that repeatedly feeling other people's distress is exhausting. People in caring and service jobs often describe having nothing left after a day of absorbing others' anxiety. You may know smaller everyday versions: a week of handling angry customers, or supporting a struggling colleague while doing your own job.
His second point is that emotional empathy is biased. We feel it most easily for people who are like us, close to us, or physically present, which makes it a poor guide to fairness. At work, it can lead you to side with the colleague you like, or the one who looks most upset, rather than the one with the stronger case. In a multicultural team, it can quietly favour people who share your background, language or sense of humour.
Bloom's argument is contested, and many psychologists think he overstates it. You do not need to accept all of it. The part this course uses is simpler: feeling what someone feels is not the same as judging their situation well. In most work conflicts, what moves things forward is an accurate understanding of how the other person sees the situation. And understanding someone's reasons does not excuse how they behaved.
Bloom and others argue that compassion is more sustainable than emotional empathy, because it drains you less and points you towards helping rather than suffering alongside someone. Compassion is warm, but it keeps you steady enough to be useful. Emotional empathy can leave both people upset and no closer to a solution.
Siew Ling takes a compassionate stance with Ravi. She accepts that his team is stretched and that he had a reason to be angry. She still plans to tell him the sprint review was the wrong place to say it. You do not have to choose between acknowledging someone's reason for anger and telling them their behaviour was wrong. A line such as "That sounds like a really hard month. What would help?" shows you care how things go for them, and it can sit in the same conversation as a clear word about what went wrong.
When a conflict comes up, work through it in this order:
Notice which kind of empathy is being asked for. At work it is usually cognitive empathy. Think about the situation from the other person's side and list the facts that shaped their reaction. Use that understanding to plan your next conversation around the real issue rather than around defending yourself. Acknowledge their pressures and care how things go for them, without absorbing their distress. Still address the behaviour that was a problem.
These distinctions are easiest to practise on someone who irritates you, because that is where understanding is hardest and most needed. The aim of the practice is to see their side clearly enough that your next conversation rests on what is really going on, rather than to like them more. Lesson 4.2, "Take the other person's view on purpose", gives you a set of questions for taking the other person's view deliberately.
In the activity below, pick a colleague who frustrates you and describe a recent situation the way they would describe it, in their own words, as Siew Ling did for Ravi.
Pick a colleague who frustrates you. Write one paragraph about a recent situation the way they would tell it, in their words.
Junxiong-WFG Organisation is an authorised representative of AIA Financial Advisers Private Limited (Reg. No. 201715016G).